Rpt antivirus

Crystal Reports File 2. Generic Report 3. AccountEdge Report. SAP Crystal Reports. Microsoft Visual Studio with Crystal Reports plug-in.

In the left part of the window, in the General Settings section, select Reports and Storage. In the right part of the window, in the Reports section, click the Delete reports button.

The Delete reports window opens. Select check boxes opposite the reports from which you want to delete information: All reports. Protection components report. Contains information about the operation of the following Kaspersky Endpoint Security components: Behavior Detection.

Exploit Prevention. You do not need to enter the password or disable password protection. The errors of integration with Windows Security Center have been fixed. Upon attempts to send the information about the server protection status to Windows Security Center, the kavfs.

When the application starts after the restart of the server, the resolution of the name to the IP address was performed incorrectly. This lead to the internal error of the task and the task stopping with an error.

After applying the critical fix, the application tries to resolve the name to the IP address and does not stop the Use of KSN task if the attempt was not successful. Errors in the algorithms for assigning categories to web pages have been fixed. After applying the critical fix, the application assigns the categories more correctly. After applying the fix, the application correctly processes folders for which NTFS junctions were created. Rules formed for folders with junction points correctly process the startup of the files they contain.

You can also use the build for Kaspersky Security When installing version After applying the critical fix, the Traffic Security component registers the name of the user that started the WSL process interception in the task log. Errors in the formation of events about the application of Kaspersky Security Center policies have been fixed. After applying the critical fix, the application only registers events when a policy is applied for the first time, and does not register a similar event at each scheduled synchronization with the Administration Server.

A centralized list of blocked nodes, located in the Administration Server Console, only registered the LUID value for a blocked node, even if the application determined a name and an address for it. After the critical fix has been applied, the Administration Server receives the correct information about the blocked node. After applying the critical fix, the report field containing the compromised URL is displayed fully.

How to install a patch for Kaspersky Security You can install Kaspersky Security Before installing Kaspersky Security Kaspersky Lab specialists may offer limited technical support for servers running these operating systems. Kaspersky Lab specialists might only be able to provide limited technical support if the application is installed on an operating system in the Windows Server family, as Microsoft no longer supports Windows Server operating systems.

You can install the Kaspersky Security Console on a server running one of the following bit Microsoft Windows operating sysems:. You can install the Kaspersky Security Console on a computer running one of the following bit Microsoft Windows operating systems:. You can install the Kaspersky Security Console on a computer running one of the following bit Microsoft Windows operating sysems:. You can install Kaspersky Embedded Systems Security on a server running one of the following bit Microsoft Windows operating systems:.

Your feedback will be used for content improvement purposes only. If you need assistance, please contact technical support. Latest update: November 14, ID: Fixes and improvements File Threat Protection The interception of file operations for network paths has been optimized.

The mechanism for calculating file attributes upon detection by application anti-virus components has been optimized. Traffic Security Errors processing requests to HTTPS websites have been fixed that led to false positives and the blocking of trusted connections. Anti-Cryptor An option to configure synchronous processing of file operations has been implemented in order to balance the load on the processor and delays processing file operations.

The vulnerability reported to the project disclosed that the probation mode in Asterisk was malfunctioning. For a reason we will get into in a little bit, Asterisk had been changed in Asterisk In all scenarios, the non-hijacked leg of the call in Asterisk will hear garbled audio.

Clearly, the probation mode option was broken between its introduction in Why did it break? As is so often the case with security vulnerabilities, the vulnerability was introduced as a result of a fix to a bug found in testing. The scenario we were attempting to address was, admittedly, rather challenging:. When a call is established from Phone 1 through both Asterisk servers to Phone 2, the resulting media flow should look like what is shown in the diagram below:.

Under direct media, Asterisk cannot start to remove itself from the media path until it has received the OK SIP response. To start direct media, Asterisk will send re-INVITEs to each endpoint indicating that they should send their media to each other as opposed to Asterisk.

While this is happening, however, Asterisk will forward RTP packets between both endpoints, so that there is minimal interruption in media. Using the example above, this looks like the following:. However, Asterisk 2 is still sending RTP media to Asterisk 1, and will continue to do so until Phone 2 removes itself from the call flow.

Many phones took a substantial amount of time to transmit the OK back to Asterisk 2, causing Asterisk 1 to re-train back onto Asterisk 2 and rejecting the RTP packets later received from Phone 2. When Asterisk 2 drops out of the media path, the end result is one-way audio.

That works just fine when all of the RTP packets are arriving at approximately the same rate. Because Asterisk is always learning, this would cause Asterisk to switch the RTP source to the malicious actor. The patch that fixed the vulnerability did so by addressing the flooding shortcoming in the original bug fix. While the RTP stack is learning about its source of media, if a source sends multiple RTP packets too fast, they are discarded. The first fix for the vulnerability was released in versions Unfortunately, the first fix for the security vulnerability missed two issues:.

While still very serious, these issues are somewhat less severe in nature:. While less severe, these were still flaws in the original fix. The patch released under AST addressed both parts:. The second fix for the vulnerability was released in versions Given all of that, why were the issues with the first patch not found during testing? The Asterisk project has a long history of treating security vulnerabilities seriously and responding responsibly to security issues within the project.

We have:.